![]() |
| ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
according to the test criteria applied in the appropriate table. If no pass decision and/or no fail decision is reached for CO2, a test is carried out on an additional vehicle (see Figure I/8). FIGURE I/8 9.1.1.2. Notwithstanding the requirements of point 5.1.1 of this Annex, the tests will be carried out on vehicles which have not travelled any distance. 9.1.1.2.1. However, at the request of the manufacturer, the tests will be carried out on vehicles which have been run-in a maximum of 15 000 km. In this case, the running-in procedure will be conducted by the manufacturer who shall undertake not to make any adjustments to those vehicles. 9.1.1.2.2. If the manufacturer asks to conduct a running-in procedure ('x' km, where x & le; 15 000 km), it may be carried out as follows: - the emission of CO2 will be measured at zero and at'x' km on the first tested vehicle (which can be the type-approval vehicle), - the evolution coefficient of the emission between zero and'x' km will be calculated as follows: It may be less than one, - the following vehicles will not be subjected to the running-in procedure, but their zero km emissions will be modified by the evolution coefficient, EC. In this case, the values to be taken will be: - the value at'x' km for the first vehicle, - the values at zero km multiplied by the evolution coefficient for the following vehicles. 9.1.1.2.3. As an alternative to this procedure, the car manufacturer can use a fixed evolution coefficient EC of 0,92 and multiply all values of CO2 measured at zero km by this factor. 9.1.1.2.4. The reference fuels described in Annex VII to Directive 91/441/EEC shall be used for this test. 9.2. Conformity of production when manufacturer's statistical data is available 9.2.1. The following sections describe the procedure to be used to verify the CO2 conformity of production requirements when the manufacturer's production standard deviation is satisfactory. 9.2.2. With a minimum sample size of three the sampling procedure is set so that the probability of a lot passing a test with 40 % of the production defective is 0,95 (producer's risk = 5 %), while the probability of a lot being accepted with 65 % of the production defective is 0,1 (consumer's risk = 10 %). 9.2.3. The following procedure is used (see Figure I/8). Let L be the natural logarithm of the CO2 type-approval value: xi = the natural logarithm of the measurement for the i-th vehicle of the sample; s = an estimate of the production standard deviation (after taking the natural logarithm of the measurements); n = the current sample number. 9.2.4. Compute for the sample, the test statistic quantifying the sum of the standardized deviations to the limit and defined as: S9.2.5. Then: - if the test statistic is greater than the pass decision number for the sample size given in Table I/ /9.2.5, a pass decision is reached, - if the test statistic is less than the fail decision number for the sample size given in Table I/ /9.2.5, a fail decision is reached, - otherwise, an additional vehicle is tested according to point 6 of this Annex and the procedure is applied to the sample with one unit more. TABLE I/ /9.2.5 >>>> ID="2">(a)> ID="3">(b)> ID="4">(c)>>> ID="2">3> ID="3">3,327> ID="4"> 4,724>>> ID="2">4> ID="3">3,261> ID="4"> 4,790>>> ID="2">5> ID="3">3,195> ID="4"> 4,856>>> ID="2">6> ID="3">3,129> ID="4"> 4,922>>> ID="2">7> ID="3">3,063> ID="4"> 4,988>>> ID="2">8> ID="3">2,997> ID="4"> 5,054>>> ID="2">9> ID="3">2,931> ID="4"> 5,120>>> ID="2">10> ID="3">2,865> ID="4"> 5,185>>> ID="2">11> ID="3">2,799> ID="4"> 5,251>>> ID="2">12> ID="3">2,733> ID="4"> 5,317>>> ID="2">13> ID="3">2,667> ID="4"> 5,383>>> ID="2">14> ID="3">2,601> ID="4"> 5,449>>> ID="2">15> ID="3">2,535> ID="4"> 5,515>>> ID="2">16> ID="3">2,469> ID="4"> 5,581>>> ID="2">17> ID="3">2,403> ID="4"> 5,647>>> ID="2">18> ID="3">2,337> ID="4"> 5,713>>> ID="2">19> ID="3">2,271> ID="4"> 5,779>>> ID="2">20> ID="3">2,205> ID="4"> 5,845>>> ID="2">21> ID="3">2,139> ID="4"> 5,911>>> ID="2">22> ID="3">2,073> ID="4"> 5,977>>> ID="2">23> ID="3">2,007> ID="4"> 6,043>>> ID="2">24> ID="3">1,941> ID="4"> 6,109>>> ID="2">25> ID="3">1,875> ID="4"> 6,175>>> ID="2">26> ID="3">1,809> ID="4"> 6,241>>> ID="2">27> ID="3">1,743> ID="4"> 6,307>>> ID="2">28> ID="3">1,677> ID="4"> 6,373>>> ID="2">29> ID="3">1,611> ID="4"> 6,439>>> ID="2">30> ID="3">1,545> ID="4"> 6,505>>> ID="2">31> ID="3">1,479> ID="4"> 6,571>>> ID="2">32> ID="3"> 2,112 > ID="4"> 2,112>>> 9.3. Conformity of production when manufacturer's statistical data is unsatisfactory or unavailable. 9.3.1. The following sections describe the procedure to be used to verify the CO2 conformity of production requirements when the manufacturer's evidence of production standard deviation is either unsatisfactory or unavailable. 9.3.2. With a minimum sample size of three the sampling procedure is set so that the probability of a lot passing a test with 40 % of the production defective is 0,95 (producer's risk = 5 %), while the probability of a lot being accepted with 65 % of the production defective is 0,1 (consumer's risk = 10 %). 9.3.3. The measurement of CO2 is considered to be log normally distributed and should first be transformed by taking the natural logarithms. Let m0 and m denote the minimum and maximum sample sizes respectively (m0 = 3 and m = 32) and let n denote the current sample number. 9.3.4. If the natural logarithms of the measurements in the series are x1, x2,..., xj and L is the natural logarithm of the CO2 type-approval value, then define: SS9.3.5. Table I/ /9.3.5 shows values of the pass (An) and fail (Bn) decision numbers against current sample number. The test statistic is the ratio dn / Vn and shall be used to determine whether the series has passed or failed as follows: for m0 & le; n & le; m: - pass the series if dn / Vn & le; An, - fail the series if dn / Vn & ge; Bn, - take another measurement if An < dn / Vn < Bn. 9.3.6. Remarks The following recursive formulae are useful for computing successive values of the test statistic: TABLE I/ /9.3.5 >>>> ID="2">(a)> ID="3">(b)> ID="4">(c)>>> ID="2">3> ID="3"> 0,80381> ID="4">16,64743>>> ID="2">4> ID="3"> 0,76339> ID="4">7,68627>>> ID="2">5> ID="3"> 0,72982> ID="4">4,67136>>> ID="2">6> ID="3"> 0,69962> ID="4">3,25573>>> ID="2">7> ID="3"> 0,67129> ID="4">2,45431>>> ID="2">8> ID="3"> 0,64406> ID="4">1,94369>>> ID="2">9> ID="3"> 0,6175 > ID="4">1,59105>>> ID="2">10> ID="3"> 0,59135> ID="4">1,33295>>> ID="2">11> ID="3"> 0,56542> ID="4">1,13566>>> ID="2">12> ID="3"> 0,5396 > ID="4">0,9797 >>> ID="2">13> ID="3"> 0,51379> ID="4">0,85307>>> ID="2">14> ID="3"> 0,48791> ID="4">0,74801>>> ID="2">15> ID="3"> 0,46191> ID="4">0,65928>>> ID="2">16> ID="3"> 0,43573> ID="4">0,58321>>> ID="2">17> ID="3"> 0,40933> ID="4">0,51718>>> ID="2">18> ID="3"> 0,38266> ID="4">0,45922>>> ID="2">19> ID="3"> 0,3557 > ID="4">0,40788>>> ID="2">20> ID="3"> 0,3284 > ID="4">0,36203>>> ID="2">21> ID="3"> 0,30072> ID="4">0,32078>>> ID="2">22> ID="3"> 0,27263> ID="4">0,28343>>> ID="2">23> ID="3"> 0,2441 > ID="4">0,24943>>> ID="2">24> ID="3"> 0,21509> ID="4">0,21831>>> ID="2">25> ID="3"> 0,18557> ID="4">0,1897 >>> ID="2">26> ID="3"> 0,1555 > ID="4">0,16328>>> ID="2">27> ID="3"> 0,12483> ID="4">0,1388 >>> ID="2">28> ID="3"> 0,09354> ID="4">0,11603>>> ID="2">29> ID="3"> 0,06159> ID="4">0,0948 >>> ID="2">30> ID="3"> 0,02892> ID="4">0,07493>>> ID="2">31> ID="3"> 0,00449> ID="4">0,05629>>> ID="2">32> ID="3"> 0,03876> ID="4">0,03876>>> 10. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 10.1. In the future, vehicles with special fuel efficient technologies may be offered which could be submitted to complementary testing programmes. These would be specified at a later stage which can be claimed by the manufacturer in order to demonstrate the advantages of the solution. 11. EXTENSION OF APPROVAL 11.1. The type-approval can be extended to vehicles from the same type or from a different type differing with regard to the following characteristics of Annex II if the CO2 emissions measured by the technical service do not exceed by more than 4 % the type-approval value: 11.1.1. Mass. 11.1.2. Maximum authorized mass. 11.1.3. Type of bodywork: saloon, estate, coupВ. 11.1.4. Overall gear ratios. 11.1.5. Engine equipment and accessories. (1) OJ No L 242, 30. 8. 1991, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 242, 30. 8. 1991, p. 1. (3) In ppm carbon equivalent. ANNEX II MODEL (maximum format: A4 (210 x 297 mm)) EC TYPE-APPROVAL CERTIFICATE STAMP OF ADMINISTRATION Communication concerning the: - type approval (1) - extension of type approval (1) - refusal of type approval (1) - withdrawal of type approval (1) of a type of vehicle / Перейти на стр.1Перейти на стр.2стр.3Перейти на стр.4 |